Safe Retirement Income

Your Retirement Depends on It

Tim Barton, Chartered Financial Consultant

Pepin Wisconsin
715-220-4866

by Leave a Comment

Retirement Plan Rollover Tips

Retirement plans come with a wide array of tax code abbreviations IRA, Roth IRA, SEP, 401(k), 403(b), HR10 just to name a few. There are times to consider doing a rollover of these funds.

When should you consider rolling over or transferring  your retirement plan?

  • Change of employment– Most retirement plans become what is known as orphaned when you leave the employer who sponsored the plan.  In order to maintain control of your money it is wise to rollover these plans into a personal retirement account.
  • Of course, when you are retiring – This is the time when you may want to start receiving income from your retirement plan.  Your plan may or may not have income options if it does shop these payments among private insurance companies.  This will insure you receive the highest income payments possible.
  • If you are receiving part of a spouse’s retirement plan due to a marital status change – It is a good idea to rollover the funds in order to maintain personal control.
  •  When your current retirement plan is terminating –  For a variety of reason employers will discontinue a plan and start another leaving the previous plan “frozen in place”.  A good time to do a rollover.
  • In-service distribution from your current plan when available can be rolled over into a personal retirement with guarantees in order prevent future losses.
  •  When you’re inheriting money as the beneficiary of a retirement plan account – Depending on your relationship with the deceased you may be able to do a spousal transfer without taxation into your own personal IRA.  Sorry kids you will have to pay income taxes.
  •  When you have worked for multiple employers, participated in multiple plans, and now desire to consolidate the assets from those different plans into a single plan.
  • If your retirement plan has no safe money investment options – it is advisable to diversify using a rollover whenever your plan allows.

A recent tax court ruled that only one IRA rollover is allowed per year.  To avoid tax problems it is better to do an institution to institution transfer.  This way the funds are never comingled with any of your other money.

Consult with a professional to help you make the most informed decision when a rollover is in your best interest.

You may ask questions in the comments or contact me privately Tim Barton, ChFC

by Leave a Comment

An Income Annuity Solution

How Can an Income Annuity Protect Against the
Risk of Living Too Long?

The purpose of an annuity is to protect against the financial risk of living too long…the risk of outliving retirement income…by providing an income guaranteed* for life.

In fact, an annuity is the ONLY financial vehicle that can systematically liquidate a sum of money in such a way that income can be guaranteed for as long as you live!

Here’s How an Income Annuity Works:

The annuity owner pays a single premium to an insurance company.

  • Beginning immediately or shortly after the single premium is paid, the insurance company pays the owner/ annuitant an income guaranteed to continue for as long as the annuitant is alive. There are other payout options also available.
  • With a cash refund provision the insurance company pays any remaining funds to the designated beneficiary after the annuitant’s death.

Seeking a secure life long retirement income?  Click the video box to left of this post.

 

by Leave a Comment

What Happens at an IRA Owner’s Death?

The following is an overview of the options available to an IRA beneficiary. Depending on the type of IRA, whether or not the IRA beneficiary is the spouse of the deceased IRA owner and the IRA beneficiary’s needs and objectives, different options may be appropriate. 

In order to avoid unforeseen and/or negative tax consequences, an IRA beneficiary should seek professional tax advice before selecting an option.

 Inherited Traditional IRA Options: 

The options available to an individual who inherits a traditional IRA include the following: 

  1. Immediate Lump-Sum Distribution: Surrender the inherited IRA and receive the entire value in a lump sum. The taxable value of the IRA is then included in the beneficiary’s income in the year of surrender.
  2. Distributions Over Five Years: If the IRA owner was under age 70-1/2 at death, the beneficiary can take any amounts from the inherited IRA, so long as all of the funds are distributed by December 31 of the year containing the fifth anniversary of the original IRA owner’s death. This option is not available if the IRA owner was over age 70-1/2 at death.
  3. Life Expectancy: The IRA assets are transferred to an inherited IRA in the beneficiary’s name, where the date by which required minimum distributions must begin depends on whether or not the beneficiary is the surviving spouse and by the IRA owner’s age at the time of death.
  4.  Spousal  Transfer:    Under this option available only to surviving spouses who are the sole IRA beneficiary, the spouse beneficiary treats the inherited IRA as his/her own and the IRA assets continue to grow tax-deferred. IRA distribution rules are then based on the spouse’s age, meaning that distributions may not be available prior to the spouse’s age 59-1/2 without paying a penalty tax and required minimum distributions must begin by the spouse’s age 70-1/2.

For spouse beneficiaries: 

    • If the deceased spouse was younger than age 70-1/2 at the time of death, the surviving spouse may delay required minimum distributions until the year in which the deceased spouse would have reached age 70-1/2.
    • If the deceased spouse was older than age 70-1/2 at the time of death, the surviving spouse must begin taking required minimum distributions by December 31 of the year following the spouse’s death.

 For non-spouse beneficiaries:

    • Required minimum distributions from the inherited IRA can be spread over the non-spouse beneficiary’s life expectancy, with the first payment required to begin no later than December 31 of the year following the year of the IRA owner’s death.

 

Inherited Roth IRA Options:

 The options available to an individual who inherits a Roth IRA include the following: 

  1. Immediate Lump-Sum Distribution:  Surrender the inherited Roth IRA and receive the entire value in a lump sum. The earnings, however, may be taxable if the Roth IRA is not at least five years old.
  2. Distributions Over Five Years: The beneficiary can take any amounts from the inherited Roth IRA, so long as all of the funds are distributed by December 31 of the year containing the fifth anniversary of the original Roth IRA owner’s death. Any earnings distributed before the Roth IRA is at least five years old, however, may be taxable. Since all amounts other than earnings can first be withdrawn tax free, it may be possible to minimize or eliminate any taxation on earnings by withdrawing them last.
  3. Life Expectancy: The IRA assets are transferred to an inherited IRA in the beneficiary’s name. For non-spouse beneficiaries, required minimum distributions based on the beneficiary’s life expectancy must begin no later than December 31 of the year following the year of the deceased Roth IRA owner’s death. For a spouse who is the sole IRA beneficiary, required minimum distributions may be postponed until the year in which the deceased Roth IRA owner would have reached age 70-1/2. Since contributions are considered to be withdrawn first, it’s unlikely that any taxable distribution of earnings will take place if the Roth IRA hasn’t been in existence for five years.
  4.  Spousal Transfer: Under this option available only to surviving spouses who are the sole Roth IRA beneficiary, the spouse beneficiary treats the Roth IRA as his/her own. Roth IRA distribution rules are then based on the spouse’s age, meaning that distributions of earnings may not be available prior to the spouse’s age 59-1/2 without tax or penalty. Since Roth IRAs have no required beginning date and no required minimum distributions, the spouse can leave the money in the Roth IRA as long as he/she wants.

by 5 Comments

RMDs a Danger to Retirement Plans?

Government regulations dictate senior’s retirement income plans.  The question; Is this government “retirement plan” the best option?

If they have a traditional IRA, 401(k) and/or any other qualified retirement plan they must take Required Minimum Distributions (RMD) upon reaching age 70- 1/2.  If they do not take RMD as required the penalty is a harsh 50%.  Most seniors follow the RMD plan so it must be the optimal way to receive retirement income… Right?

The new reality is nothing could be further from the truth.  Expected longevity continues to increase well past the I.R.S. life tables used to calculate RMD withdrawals.  This could  set up a dangerous financial situation later in life.

The alternative solution and one most seniors have not considered  is a Life Income Annuity.  Rollovers from IRAs and 401(k)s are easy and there are no taxes due or 10% penalty even if income is started before age 59.

Advantages of Life Income Annuities are significant and perform better than RMD plans:

  1. After enduring a decade of sub economic performance, low interest rates,  disappearing pensions and a decreasing Social Security trust fund seniors need protection from steep market swings. Income annuities eliminate market risk by providing a steady monthly pay check.
  2. Saves the golden decade of retirement; the 10 years from age 70 – 80.  RMDs are scheduled to be lower during this time and increase later.  The lifetime annuity has on average a 60% higher payout  during the golden decade and guarantees these payments for life with any remaining principal paid to beneficiaries.
  3. Prevents the RMD crash.   A typical life income annuity starts payments at age 70 about 60% higher than RMD withdrawals.  It is true RMDs increase with age but assuming a 3% growth rate at their peak they  will provide an income 15% lower than the annuity.  After the RMD’s peak withdrawal years the  annual income begins decreasing until the money runs out.

Lifetime annuities take the RMD drop off  and longevity risk away while offering a higher payout.

For help you may ask questions in the comments

Or contact me privately: Tim Barton Chartered Financial Consultant

 

by Leave a Comment

4% Rule or a Lifetime Income Annuity

Outliving one’s assets is a major concern for today’s retirees. One common approach to address this concern has been the “4% rule,” which is a generally accepted rule of thumb in financial planning for retirement income. It says to withdraw no more than 4% of an asset in retirement annually, and then increase the withdrawn amount by 3% each year to help offset the effects of inflation. Many believe the 4% rule provides a strong likelihood for retirement assets to last 30 or more years.

One problem with the 4% rule is that it does NOT GUARANTEE you won’t run out of money. In fact, with today’s historic market volatility and longer life expectancies, it’s predicted that up to 18 out of 100 people WILL RUN OUT OF MONEY in retirement using the 4% rule.

What if there was a different strategy that could provide the same amount of retirement income as the 4% rule and might even require fewer assets to do so? Additionally, this strategy would protect your income from market loss and GUARANTEE that income would last throughout your lifetime.

This strategy exists today and can be implemented using a fixed index annuity with a guaranteed lifetime income benefit or a secure lifetime retirement income annuity.

For help you may ask questions in the comments

Or contact me privately here: Tim Barton Chartered Financial Consultant

by Leave a Comment

When You Change Jobs…You May Have an Important Decision to Make!

What to do with your money in an employer-sponsored retirement plan, such as a 401(k) plan. Since these funds were originally intended to help provide financial security during retirement, you need to carefully evaluate which of the following options will best ensure that these assets remain available to contribute to a financially-secure retirement.

Take the Funds: You can withdraw the funds in a lump sum and do what you please with them. This is, however, rarely a good idea unless you need the funds for an emergency.

Consider:
•A mandatory 20% federal income tax withholding will be subtracted from the lump sum you receive.
•You may have to pay additional federal (and possibly state) income tax on the lump sum distribution, depending on your tax bracket (and the distribution may put you in a higher bracket).
•Unless one of the exceptions is met, you may also have to pay a 10% premature distribution tax in addition to regular income tax.
•The funds will no longer benefit from the tax-deferred growth of a qualified retirement plan.

Leave the Funds:

You can leave the funds in your previous employer’s retirement plan, where they will continue to grow on a tax-deferred basis. If you’re satisfied with the investment performance/options available, this may be a good alternative. Leaving the funds temporarily while you explore the various options open to you may also be a good alternative. (Note: If your vested balance in the retirement plan is $5,000 or less, you may be required to take a lump-sum distribution.)

Roll the Funds Over:

You can take the funds from the plan and roll them over, either to your new employer’s retirement plan (assuming the plan accepts rollovers) or to a traditional IRA, where you have more control over investment decisions. This approach offers the advantages of preserving the funds for use in retirement, while enabling them to continue to grow on a tax-deferred basis.

Why Taking a Lump-Sum Distribution May Be a Bad Idea:

While a lump-sum distribution can be tempting, it can also cost you thousands of dollars in taxes, penalties and lost growth opportunities…money that will not be available for future use in retirement.

For help you may ask questions in the comments or contact me privately here: Tim Barton Chartered Financial Consultant

by Leave a Comment

Why Are Taxes Due On A Roth After Age 59 ½ ?

This is a common question.  Many believe there are no income taxes due on Roth withdrawals after reaching that magic age of 59 ½.   However there are conditions on nontaxable withdrawals.  The IRS has rules that define a withdrawal as qualified distributions. Qualified distributions from a Roth IRA are received free of income tax and are not subject to the 10% premature withdrawal penalty tax.

Roth IRA distributions that do not meet the qualified distribution requirements will be included in income to the extent that the distribution represents earnings on Roth IRA contributions and may be subject to a 10% premature withdrawal penalty tax. 

Qualified distributions from a Roth IRA are not included in gross income and are not subject to the additional 10% penalty tax for premature distributions.

To be a tax-free qualified distribution:

  • The distribution must occur more than five years after the individual first contributed to the Roth IRA;  and
  • The individual must be at least 59-1/2 years old, disabled, deceased or the funds must be used to purchase a first home ($10,000 lifetime limit). 

There is no requirement that distributions from a Roth IRA begin by age 70-1/2.

Unlike regular IRAs, contributions to a Roth IRA can be made after age 70-1/2.

For help you may ask questions in the comments or contact me privately here: Tim Barton Chartered Financial Consultant

 

by Leave a Comment

A One in Five Chance of Retirement Failure?

Retirement planning has become all about the income, as in how much and for how long.  Last year the Journal of Financial Planning conducted extensive research into retirement portfolio withdrawal rates. They concluded the traditional 4% rule was too risky because it leaves a retiree with an 18% chance of portfolio failure; that’s about a one in five failure rate.   

Portfolio failure is another way saying “sorry your money is all gone”.  Very bad news to someone in their 70’s potentially looking at many more years of life by surviving only on Social Security each month.   

What is the new safe withdrawal rate?

  • 2.52% According to the Journal of Financial Planning.

Let’s be clear retirement money that is invested in equities; stock market, mutual funds, ETF, variable annuity etc. has an 18% chance of failure if the retiree withdraws more than 2.52% per year.

What is the solution? 

With interest rates hovering around 1% certainly not bonds or certificates of deposit. 

That leaves fixed annuities because they can insure a retirement income for life.  But their rates are also low and the income is sometimes level with no chance of increase. 

Enter the time tested fixed index annuity with income options.  An indexed annuity can offer a guaranteed withdrawal percentage increase, meaning each year you own an indexed annuity the percentage you can withdraw goes up; some as high as 7%.   

Let’s compare the recommended 2.52% equity withdrawal and 7% index annuity withdrawal using a nice round figure like $100,000.

2.52% of $100,000 in equities is $2520 per year.

Whereas the annuity’s 7% withdrawal is $7000 per year and this $7000 could go up each year if there is an index interest credit and once it goes up, it is guaranteed to stay up. 

The choices are:

  • Unsafe withdrawal using the antiquated 4% rule and risk running out of money 1 out of 5 times. ($4000 per year)
  • The new “safe” 2.52% rule ($2520 per year)
  • The insured, guaranteed 7% index annuity ($7000 per year)

Which would you prefer?

For help you may ask questions in the comments or contact me privately here:

Tim Barton

Chartered Financial Consultant

 

 

by Leave a Comment

My Retirement Budget is Being Squeezed: How does part time work affect Social Security Benefits?

Low yields on retirement savings and increasing costs are causing some retirees to consider part time or temporary work to make ends meet. 

If they work what happens to their Social Security benefit? 

Does it pay to work?

Continuing to work after you begin receiving Social Security retirement benefits may reduce the amount of those benefits ultimately available to support your retirement standard of living in two ways:

  1. Your earned income (wages and self-employment income) may cause your Social Security benefits to be subject to income tax. If your Social Security benefits are not currently exposed to income tax, you should evaluate whether your earned income will put you over the tax-free base amount of Social Security retirement benefits ($25,000 if single; $32,000 if married filing jointly).
  2. If you are between the ages of 62 and your full retirement age (age 66 in 2012), your 2012 Social Security benefits are reduced $1 for each $2 of your earned income in excess of the 2012 exempt amount of $14,640. The exempt amount is adjusted each year for inflation.

If you are receiving Social Security benefits and you have reached your full retirement age, there is no retirement earnings test for people who have reached their Social Security full retirement age (age 66 for people born between 1943 and 1954). Here’s how it works: 

  • In the year in which you reach full retirement age, $1 in benefits will be deducted for each $3 you earn above a specific annual limit ($38,880 in 2012), but only counting earnings before the month in which you reach the full benefit retirement age. 
  • Starting with the month in which you reach full retirement age (age 66 for people born between 1943 and 1954), you will receive the full Social Security retirement benefit to which you are entitled, without regard for or limit on your earnings.

Also keep in mind some annuity payments do not count as taxable income allowing a retiree who is receiving these payments to earn more in wages before triggering any of the Social Security earning limits.

You may ask questions in the comments or contact me privately:

Tim Barton  Chartered Financial Consultant

 

by 2 Comments

No Limits on Life, How Long Would You Live?

Imagine tomorrow at your local medical center the doctor asks you, “How long do you want to live? Just give me your desired age of death and I will conveniently make the arrangements.”

This must be make-believe fantasy. Well, not so fast. Consider what the Aubrey DeGrey, SENS Foundation’s chief science officer says about this possibility.

I call it longevity escape velocity — where we have a sufficiently comprehensive panel of therapies to enable us to push back the ill health of old age faster than time is passing. And that way, we buy ourselves enough time to develop more therapies as time goes on.

In other words medical science is moving faster than we are aging.

DeGrey continues.

I’d say we have a 50/50 chance of bringing aging under what I’d call a decisive level of medical control within the next 25 years or so and what I mean by decisive is the same sort of medical control that we have over most infectious disease today.

Wow 50/50! Most of us would take those odds in any wager. But this is no ordinary wager; we’re talking life here and a lot of it. The ramifications to society as we know it are hard to imagine.

Exit questions.

How long would you choose to live?

Would the amount of your retirement savings dictate whether you choose to live or die?

If you are not retired when would you plan to retire assuming this new dynamic?

Perhaps we are on the threshold of these things no longer being an academic discussion.